Comments on: People’s War in Nepal: 17 Years Retrospective

By: Owain

Owain — Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:25:09 +0000

Robert, please can you outline the ways in which Bob Avakian’s New synthesis can make a meaningful contribution to the analysis of, and reality of the Nepali context or anywhere else for that matter.

By: Owain

Owain — Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:22:59 +0000

Robert, please can you outline for me and those visiting this site what Bob Avakian has actually ever achieved – I am struggling to see anything of any substance.

Your criticism of Nepali Maoists the Prachandapath is a disgrace given the 10 year People’s War and sacrifice of so many martyrs giving so much for Maoism in general and Nepal specially.

As Mao says:

“Wherever there is struggle there is sacrifice, and death is a common occurrence. But we have the interests of the people and the sufferings of the great majority at heart, and when we die for the people it is a worthy death.” (Serve the People” (September 8, 1944), Selected Works, Vol. III, p. 228).

I see little evidence of you, the RCP and your savour Bob Avakian having sacrificed anything of any value and substance.

By: Owain

Owain — Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:13:27 +0000

Robert, i am afraid once more you have embarrassed yourself. Bob Avakian’s new synthesis is a joke outside of RCP circles

By: Robert

Robert — Mon, 04 Jun 2012 22:49:01 +0000

without BOB AVAKIAN’S new synthesis, WPRM is all played out.
Democracy and Class struggle has abandoned revolutionary communism for welsh nationalism, Nick Glais is all played out
WPRM has been following Prachanda Path, and now has seen that this is all played out!
Nepalese revolutionaries should take up the NEW SYNTHESIS is they want a true revolution.

By: Robert

Robert — Mon, 04 Jun 2012 22:32:22 +0000

Bob Avakian was right about Nepal and only Bob Avakian’s new synthesis offer a way forward. Comrades in Nepal should take up the New Synthesis, as should WPRM in Britain and elsewhere if they want a future. long live Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Mao AVAKIAN

this document by Bob Avakian is far more important than PrachandaPath:

http://rwor.org/avakian/what-humanity-needs/interview.html

By: Kamal

Kamal — Wed, 30 May 2012 13:01:29 +0000

When it comes about the issue of projecting the leadership I don’t know how I can distinguish between Prachandapath and Avakian’s new synthesis.

While talking about Prachandapath I think the Maoist party in Nepal made a mistake by using a person’s name to project the whole party’s line which was a collective contribution of all party leaders and members along with experiences of the great people’s war.

Again I’m not sure about Avakian’s new synthesis whether that is the work of comrade prophet or collective contribution of other comrades around him.

By: robert

robert — Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:40:02 +0000

bob avakian was right! this is what happens when parties do not take up Bob Avakian’s New synthesis.